Classification of the Paleoproterozoic Gulcheru Formation: Implications on Early Paleogeographic and Tectonic Evolution of the Cuddapah Basin, India

Authors

  • Geological Studies Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata - 700 108
  • Geological Studies Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata - 700 108

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-020-1523-z

Keywords:

No Keywords.

Abstract

The Papaghni sub-basin of the Cuddapah basin is an arcuate NW-SE trending intracratonic basin, stretching from Kurnool in the NW to Guvvalacheruvu in the SE, in southern peninsular India. Despite of large number of researches, an understanding of the evolution of the basin is still elusive. The sub-basin preserves records of repeated opening and closing of Paleoproterozoic rifts along the zone of NW-SE trending axis in the East Dharwar craton. Present study was carried out along the southwestern margin of the Papaghni sub-basin, in and around Tadpatri-Gooty-Dhone area, where the successive litho-units are represented by two major unconformity-bound sequences. Each of these sequences are characterized by a distinctive set of litho-assemblage, deposited under diverse tectonic environments with highly variable modes and tempos of sedimentation in an extensional basin. The basin initiated at about 2 Ga and shortly evolved into a shallow sea, with development of wide siliciclastic shelf in an open marine condition, the Gulcheru Formation. Gradually, with time the siliciclastic shelf was replaced by an extensive stromatolitic carbonate platform, the Vempalle Formation. Dedicated fieldwork exemplifies that the initial basin-fill is characterized largely by several cycles of simple, but amalgamated and stacked fanglomerates (alluvial fan to fan-delta) systems developed from several single stream breaches onto the proximal setting of the basin, in a syn-rift setting. These fanglomerates display a fining upward sequence, which progressively passes up to high-energy coastal, tide-storm dominated shelf environments of post-rift setting. This study justifies the subdivision of the Gulcheru Formation into two formal lithostratigraphic members, the Daditota Member and the Karvipalle Member. The Daditota Member directly overlies the granitoid basement and grades upward to Karvipalle Member. Karvipalle Member, comprising predominantly of medium to finegrained, reddish brown and white quartz arenites of stable shelf deposits, distinctly differs from the conglomerate and very coarsegrained mass-flow dominated deposits of the Daditota Member. The Vempalle Formation overlies the Gulcheru Formation with a gradational contact and consists of stromatolitic dolomite, oolite and shale, developed in a ramp type carbonate platform setting. Gradual transition from siliciclastic to carbonate sequence points to passive margin setting developed during the breakup of the supercontinent Kenorland. Disposition of proximal to distal sequences and northeastern, eastern and southeastern paleocurrent of the sequences advocate a NW-SE shoreline and eastern paleoslope of the basin.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Published

2020-08-31

How to Cite

Majumder, T., & Patranabis-Deb, S. (2020). Classification of the Paleoproterozoic Gulcheru Formation: Implications on Early Paleogeographic and Tectonic Evolution of the Cuddapah Basin, India. Journal of Geological Society of India, 96(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-020-1523-z

References

Allen, J.L. and Johnson, C.L. (2010) Facies control on sandstone composition (and influence of statistical methods on interpretations) in the John Henry Member, Straight Cliffs Formation, southern Utah, USA. Sediment. Geol., v.230(1-2), pp.60-76.

Allen, P.A., Eriksson, P.G., Alkmim, F.F., Betts, P.G., Catuneanu, O., Mazumder, R., Meng, Q., Young, G.M. (2015) Classification of basins, with special reference to Proterozoic examples. Geol. Soc. London, Mem., v.43(1), pp.5-28.

Anand, M., Gibson, S.A., Subbarao, K.V., Kelley, S.P., Dickin, A.P. (2003) Early Proterozoic melt generation processes beneath the intracratonic Cuddapah basin, Southern India. Jour. Petrol., v.44, pp.2139-2171.

Basu, A. (1976) Petrology of Holocene fluvial sand derived from plutonic source rocks; implications to paleoclimatic interpretation. Jour. Sediment. Res., v.46(3), pp.694-709.

Basu, A. and Bickford, M.E. (2015) An alternate perspective on the opening and closing of the intracratonic Purana basins in peninsular India. Jour Geol. Soc. India, v.85(1), pp.5-25.

Blair, T.C. and Bilodeau, W.L. (1988) Development of tectonic cyclothems in rift, pull-apart, and foreland basins: Sedimentary response to episodic tectonism. Geology, v.16(6), pp.517-520.

Blatt, H. (1967) Provenance determinations and recycling of sediments. Jour. Sediment. Res., v.37(4), pp.1031-1044.

Chakrabarti, G. and Shome, D. (2010) Interaction of microbial communities with clastic sedimentation during Palaeoproterozoic time-An example from basal Gulcheru Formation, Cuddapah basin, India. Sediment. Geol., v.226(1-4), pp.22-28.

Chetty, T.R.K. (2011) Tectonics of Proterozoic Cuddapah basin, Southern India: a conceptual model. Jour. Geol. Soc. India, v.78(5), pp.446-456.

Collins, A.S., Patranabis-Deb, S., Alexander, E., Bertram, C.N., Falster, G.M., Gore, R.J., Mackintosh, J., Dhang, P.C., Saha, D., Payne, J.L., Jourdan, F. (2015) Detrital mineral age, radiogenic isotopic stratigraphy and tectonic significance of the Cuddapah Basin, India. Gondwana Res., v.28(4), pp.1294-1309.

Committee on Stratigraphic Nomenclature of India (1971) Code of stratigraphic nomenclature of India. Geol. Surv. India, Misc. Publ., v.20, pp.9-73.

Dasgupta, P.K. and Biswas, A. (2006) Rhythms in Proterozoic sedimentation: an example from Peninsular India. Satish Serial Publishing House, Delhi, India, pp.1-30.

Davis, W.M. (1899) The geographical cycle. The Geographical Jour., v.14(5), pp.481-504.

Eriksson, K.A. and Fedo, C.M. (1994) Archean synrift and stable-shelf sedimentary successions. In: Condie, K.C. (Ed.), Developments in Precambrian geology. Elsevier, v.11, pp.171-204.

Ernst, R.E., Bleeker, W., Söderlund, U., Kerr, A.C. (2013) Large Igneous Provinces and supercontinents: Toward completing the plate tectonic revolution. Lithos, v.174, pp.1-14.

Folk, R.L. (1960) Petrography and origin of the Tuscarora, Rose Hill, and Keefer formations, lower and middle Silurian of eastern West Virginia. Jour. Sediment. Res., v.30(1), pp.1-58.

French, J.E., Heaman, L.M., Chacko, T., Srivastava, R.K. (2008) 1891-1883Ma Southern Bastar-Cuddapah mafic igneous events, India: a newly recognized large igneous province. Precambrian Res., v.160, pp.308-322.

Gawthorpe, R.L., Sharp, I., Underhill, J.R., Gupta, S. (1997) Linked sequence stratigraphic and structural evolution of propagating normal faults. Geology, v.25(9), pp.795-798.

Gawthorpe, R.L. and Leeder, M.R. (2000) Tectono-sedimentary evolution of active extensional basins. Basin Res., v.12(3-4), pp.195-218.

Holland, T.H. (1907) Classification of the Indian strata, Presidential address, Trans. Min. Geol. Inst., India.

Jahnert, R.J. and Collins, L.B. (2012) Characteristics, distribution and morphogenesis of subtidal microbial systems in Shark Bay, Australia. Marine Geology, v.303, pp.115-136.

Kale, V.S. (1991) Constraints on the evolution of the Purana basins of Peninsular India. Jour. Geol. Soc. India, v.38(3), pp.231-252.

Kale, V.S. and Phansalkar, V.G. (1991) Purana basins of peninsular India: a review. Basin Res., v.3(1), pp.1-36.

Kale, V.S. (2016) Proterozoic basins of peninsular India: Status within the Global Proterozoic Systems. Proc. Indian National Sci. Acad., v.82(3), pp.461-477.

Khan, T., Sarma, D.S., Somasekhar, V., Ramanaiah, S. and Reddy, N.R. (2020) Geochemistry of the Palaeoproterozoic quartzites of Lower Cuddapah Supergroup, South India: implication for the palaeoweathering, provenance, and crustal evolution. Geol. Jour., v.55(2), pp.1587-1611.

King, W. (1872) Kudapah and Karnul Formations in the Madras Presidency. Geol. Surv. India, Mem., v.8, p.346.

Korsch, R.J. and Lindsay, J.F. (1989) Relationships between deformation and basin evolution in the intracratonic Amadeus Basin, central Australia. Tectonophysics, v.158(1-4), pp.5-22.

Leeder, M.R. and Gawthorpe, R.L. (1987) Sedimentary models for extensional tilt block/ half-graben basins. Geol. Soc. London, Spec. Publ., v.28, pp.139-152.

Lindsay, J.F., Kennard, J.M., Southgate, P.N. (1993) Application of sequence stratigraphy in an intracratonic setting, Amadeus Basin, central Australia. Sequence Stratigraphy and Facies Associations, pp.605-631.

Logan, B.W., Rezak, R., Ginsburg, R.N. (1964) Classification and environmental significance of algal stromatolites. Jour. Geol., v.72, pp.68-83.

Majumder, T., Patranabis-Deb, S., Nemec, W. (2015) Palaeoproterozoic sedimentation in the Papaghni sub-basin of southern India. 31st Meeting of IAS (International association of Sedimentologists) Sedimentology, Abstract volume, p.30.

Meijerink, A.M.J., Rao, D.P., Rupke, J. (1984) Stratigraphic and structural development of the Precambrian Cuddapah basin, SE India. Precambrian Res., v.26, pp.57-104.

Nagaraja Rao, B.K., Rajurkar, S.T., Ramalingaswamy, G., Ravindra Babu, B. (1987) Stratigraphy, structure and evolution of the Cuddapah basin. In: Radhakrishna, B.P. (Ed.), Purana Basins of Peninsular India (Middle to Late Proterozoic). Mem. Geol. Soc. India, no.6, pp.33-86.

North American Commission on Stratigraphic Nomenclature (1983) North American Stratigraphic code. AAPG Bull., v.67, pp.841-875.

North American Commission on Stratigraphic Nomenclature (2005) North American Stratigraphic code. AAPG Bull., v.89(11), pp.1547-1591.

Patranabis-Deb, S. and Chaudhuri, A.K. (2007) A retreating fan-delta system in the Neoproterozoic Chhattisgarh rift basin, central India: major controls on its evolution. AAPG Bull., v.91, pp.785-808.

Patranabis-Deb, S., Saha, D., Tripathy, V. (2012) Basin stratigraphy, sea-level fluctuations and their global tectonic connections evidence from the Proterozoic Cuddapah Basin. Geological Jour., v.47, pp.263-283.

Patranabis-Deb, S., Majumder, T., Khan, S. (2018) Lifestyles of the palaeoproterozoic stromatolite builders in the Vempalle Sea, Cuddapah Basin, India. Jour. Asian Earth Sc., v.157, pp.360-370.

Patranabis-Deb, S., Saha, D. and Santosh, M. (2020) Tracking India Within Precambrian Supercontinent Cycles. Chapter 3. In: Gupta N.S. and Tandon S.K., (Eds.), Geodynamics of the Indian Plate: Evolutionary Perspectives. Springer Nature, Switzerland, pp.105-143.

Playfair, J. (2011) Illustrations of the Huttonian Theory of the Earth. Cambridge University Press, 531p.

Rai, A.K., Pandey, U.K., Zakaulla, S., Parihar, P.S. (2015) New 1.9-2.0 Ga, Pb-Pb (PbSL), Age of Dolomites from Vempalle Formation, Lower Cuddapah Supergroup, Eastern Dharwar Craton, India. Jour. Geol. Soc.

India, v.86(2), pp.131-136.

Ramakrishnan, M. and Vaidyanathan, R. (2008) Geology of India. Geological Society of India, Bangalore, v.1, 556p.

Ramam, P.K. and Murty, V.N. (1997) Geology of Andhra Pradesh. Geological Society of India, Bangalore, 257p.

Read, J.F. (1982) Carbonate platforms of passive (extensional) continental margins: types, characteristics and evolution. Tectonophysics, v.81(3-4), pp.195-212.

Rogers, J.J. and Santosh, M., 2004. Continents and supercontinents. Oxford University Press, 288p.

Saha, D., Ghosh, G., Chakraborty, A.K., Chakraborti, S. (2006) Comparable Neoproterozoic sedimentary sequences in Palnad and Kurnool sub-basins and their paleogeographic and tectonic implications. Indian Jour. Geol., v.78(1-4), pp.175-192.

Saha, D., Chakraborti, S., Tripathy, V. (2010) Intracontinental thrusts and inclined transpression along eastern margin of the east Dharwar Craton, India. Jour. Geol. Soc. India, v.75(1), pp.323-337.

Sai, V.S., Khanna, T.C. and Reddy, N.R.K. (2016) Red beds in the Cuddapah Basin, eastern Dharwar craton, India: Implications for the initiation of sedimentation during the Proterozoic Oxygenation event. Jour. Indian Geophys. Union, v.20(3), pp.342-350.

Sen, S.N., and Narasimha Rao, Ch. (1967) Igneous activity in Cuddapah basin and adjacent areas and suggestions on the paleogeography of the basin. Proceeding of Symposium; Upper Mantle Project 8. GRB & NGRI publication: Hyderabad, pp.261-285.

Sloss, L.L. (1990) Epilog. In: Leighton, M.W., Kolata, D.R., Oltz, D.F., Eidel, J.J. (Eds.), Interior cratonic basins. AAPG Mem., no.51, pp.799-805.

Soares, P.C., Barbosa Landim, P.M., Fulfaro, V.J. (1978) Tectonic cycles and sedimentary sequences in the Brazilian intracratonic basins. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., v.89(2), pp.181-191.

Tripathy, V. and Saha, D. (2013) Plate margin paleostress variations and intracontinental deformations in the evolution of the Cuddapah basin through Proterozoic. Precambrian Res., v.235, pp.107-130.

Whipple, K.X. and Trayler, C.R. (1996) Tectonic control of fan size: the importance of spatially variable subsidence rates. Basin Res., v.8(3), pp.351-366.

Whittaker, A., Cope, J.C.W., Cowie, J.W., Gibbons, W., House, M., Jenkins, D.G., Rawson, P., Rushton, A., Smith, D.G., Thomas, A.T., Wimbledon, W.A. (1991) A guide to stratigraphical procedure. Jour. Geol. Soc. London, v.148(5), pp.813-824.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.