Himalayan Earthquakes and Developing an Earthquake Resilient Society

Authors

  • CSIR-National Geophysical Research Institute, Uppal Road, Hyderabad – 500 007
  • Disaster Risk Reduction, Mumbai – 400 088
  • CSIR-North-East Institute of Science & Technology, Jorhat - 785 001
  • CSIR, Scientist (G) Retd, New Delhi - 110 001
  • CSIR-North-East Institute of Science & Technology, Jorhat - 785 001

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-020-1581-2

Abstract

Himalayan region is seismically one of the most active continental regions. It experienced at least 4 M ~ 8 earthquakes during an active phase from 1897 to 1952. However, no such earthquake has occurred since 1952. Detailed investigations have revealed that the region is currently in a seismic quiescence phase, and enough strains have been accumulated to source several M ~ 8 earthquakes. However, when and where such an earthquake would occur cannot be forecasted. Even if such an earthquake is forecasted to occur, can everyone leave to a safe place? That is not practical. It is therefore important to learn to live with earthquakes and develop an earthquake resilient society. Recent earthquakes have demonstrated the effectiveness of such an approach. One very effective way to develop earthquake resilient society is to create an earthquake scenario for the repeat of an earlier earthquake, estimate the losses, and then go through an exercise of imparting and sharing with public, state and central governance the ways and means of reducing the anticipated losses. The National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA), Government of India, in collaboration with other agencies, built earthquake scenarios for the repeat of the 1905 Kangra earthquake of M ~ 8 and 1897 Shillong earthquake of M 8.7. Appropriate ground motion prediction equation was used to generate earthquake intensities. The intensities of the hypothetical Mw 8 earthquake located at Mandi in Himachal Pradesh (close to the epicenter of 1905 Kangra earthquake) were compared with the 1905 Kangra earthquake's isoseismals and found to be satisfactory. For the 1897 Shillong earthquake, the isoseismals drawn by experts for the 1897 earthquake were used. Using the 2011 Census data for demography and building typology, it was estimated that if the hypothetical Mandi earthquake occurs in the middle of the night, the human lives lost would be ~ 959100 combining the states of Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Haryana and the Union Territory of Chandigarh. It may be noted that the 1905 earthquake had claimed ~ 20,000 human lives. For the repeat of Shillong M 8.7 earthquake in the mid of the night, the number of lives lost estimated would be ~ 423000 in the 8 north-east states (Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Sikkim, Nagaland, Manipur, Tripura and Mizoram). NDMA took up detailed preparatory exercises involving the center and state bodies for Rapid Visual Screening (RVS) of lifeline buildings; school sensitization events; Incident Response System (IRS); and Awareness Generation programs involving local celebrities and a variety of news media. National Disaster Response Force (NDRF) and State Disaster Response Force(s) (SDRF) played a crucial role. To test the preparedness, mega-mock drills were held on 13 February 2013 for the 3 north-western states and UT Chandigarh; and on 10 and 13 March 2014 for the 8 north-eastern states. Performances of all the sectors were evaluated by independent observers. There was an excellent media coverage and the very purpose of generating awareness of the losses due to foreseeable earthquakes and how to reduce them was amply demonstrated. It is important to conduct similar exercises in other regions falling under Seismic Zones V and IV of the country. Of utmost importance is educating school students on an yearly basis, ways and means of developing earthquake resilience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Published

2020-11-01

How to Cite

Gupta, H. K., Sabnis, K. A., Duarah, R., Saxena, R. S., & Baruah, S. (2020). Himalayan Earthquakes and Developing an Earthquake Resilient Society. Journal of Geological Society of India, 96(5), 433–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-020-1581-2

References

Alesheikh, A.A. (2011) A GIS-based Earthquake Damage Assessment and Settlement Methodology. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engg., v.31(11), pp.1607-17.

Ambraseys, N. and Bilham, R. (2003) Re-evaluated Intensities for the Great Assam Earthquake of 12 June 1897, Shillong, India. Bull. Seismol Soc. Amer., v.93(2), pp.655-673.

Banerjee, P. and Burgmann, R. (2002) Convergence across the northwest Himalaya from GPS measurements. Geophys. Res. Lett., v.29. DOI:10.1029/2002GL015184.

Bilham, R. (2019) Himalayan Earthquakes: a review of historical seismicity and early 21st century slip potential. Geol. Soc. London. Spec. Publ., no.483, pp.423-482.

Bilham, R. and England, P (2001) Plateu pop-up in the 1897 Assam earthquake. Nature, v.410, pp.806-809.

Boore, D.M. and Atkinson, G.M. (2008) Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s. Earthquake Spectra, v.24, pp.99-138.

Census of India (2011) Household & population survey reports.

Chandra, U. (1978) Seismicity, earthquake mechanisms and tectonics along the Himalayan mountain range and vicinity. Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors, v.6, pp.109-131

Chandra, U. (1992)Seismotectonics of Himalaya. In: Seismology in India - An Overview. Curr. Sci., v.62(1&2), pp.40-71.

Cinicioglu, S.F., Bozbey, I., Oztoprak, S. and Kelesoglu, M.K. (2007) An integrated earthquake damage assessment methodology and its application for two districts in Istanbul, Turkey. Enggg. Geol., v.94(3-4), pp.145-165.

De Rossi, M.S.L. (1883) Programma dell'Osservatorio ed Archivio Centrale Geodinamico presso il R. Comitato Geologico d'Italia. Bollettino del Vulcanismo Italiano, v.10, pp.3-128.

Des Roches et al. (2011) Overview of the 2010 Haiti Earthquake. Earthquake Spectra, v.27(1_suppl.1), pp.1-21.

Gupta, H. K. (2020) Recent Earthquakes in Delhi and Developing an Earthquake Resilient Society Jour. Geol. Soc. India, v.96, pp.107-110.

Gupta, H. K., Purnachandra Rao, N. and Robert Yeats (2009) The Devastating Muzaffarabad earthquake of 8 October 2005 in Western Himalaya. Jour. Seismol., v.13, pp.313-420.

Gupta, H. and Gahalut, V.K. (2014) Seismotectonics and large earthquake generation in Himalayan region, Gondwana Res. DOI:10.1016/j.gr.2012.11.006

Gupta, H.K. (1993) Seismic Hazard Assessment in the Alpide Belt from Iran to Burma. Annali Di Geofisica, XXXVI, No.3-4, pp.61-82.

Gupta, H.K. and Gahalaut, V.K. (2015) Can an Earthquake of Mw~9 occur in the Himalayan Region? Geol. Soc. London, Spec. Publ., no.412, pp.43-53.

Gupta, H.K., Khanal, K.N., Upadhyay, S.K., Sarkar, D., Rastogi, B.K. and Duda, S.J. (1995) Verification of magnitudes of Himalayan region earthquakes of 1903 1985 from Goettingen Observatory, Tectonophysics, v.244, pp.267-284.

Gutenberg, B. and Richter, C.F. (1954) Seismicity of the Earth and Associataed Phenomena. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.

Hough, S. E., Bilham, R., Ambrayses, N. and Feldl, N. (2005) Revisiting the 1897 Shillong and 1905 Kangra earthquakes in northern India: site response, Moho reflections and a triggered earthquake. Curr. Sci., v.88, pp.1632-1638.

Jackson, M. and Bilham R. (1994) Constraints on Himalayan deformation inferred from vertical velocity fields in Nepal and Tibet. Jour. Geophys. Res., v.99(13), pp.13897-13912.

Jaiswal, K., Wald, D.J., Earle, P.S., Porter, K.A. and Hearne, M. (2011) Earthquake casualty models within the USGS prompt assessment of global earthquakes for response (PAGER) system.

Miura, H., Midorikawa, S., Fujimoto, K., Pacheco, B.M. and Yamanaka, H. (2008). Earthquake damage estimation in Metro Manila, Philippines based on seismic performance of buildings evaluated by local experts' judgments. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engg., v.28(10-11), pp.764-777.

Molnar, P., Fitch, T. J. and Wu, F.T. (1973) Fault plane solutions of shallow earthquakes and contemporary tectonics in Asia. Earth and Planet. Sci. Lett., v.19, pp.101-112.

Ni, J. and Barazangi, M. (1984) Seismotectonics of the Himalayan collision zone: geometry of the underthrusting Indian plate beneath the Himalaya. Jour. Geophys. Res., v.89, pp.1147-1163.

Oldham, R. D. (1899) Report on the great earthquake of June 12, 1897. Mem. Geol. Surv. India, v.29, 379p.

Oldham, T.A. (1883) Catalogue of Indian earthquakes. Mem. Geol. Survey of India, Spec. Publ., no.19, pp.163-215.

Richter, C.F. (1958) Elementary Seismology, WH Freeman and Co., San Francisco, California, 768p.

Satake, K. (2014) The 2011 Tohuku, Japan, earthquake and tsunami. In: A. Ismail Zadeh et al., (Eds.), Extreme Natural Hazards, Disaster Risks and Societal Implications. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp.310-321.

Satyabala, S.P. and Gupta H.K. (1996) Is the quiescence of major earthquakes (M ³ 7.5) since 1952 in the Himalaya and northeast India real? Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., v.86, pp.1983-1986.

Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Building Types in India: Technical document on seismic vulnerability function of building typologies - by - Seismic vulnerability Assessment Project Group of IIT Bombay, IIT Guwahati, IIT Kharagpur, IIT Madras & IIT Roorkee. Submitted to NDMA, Sep 13 2013

Sinha, R., Aditya, K.S.P. and Gupta, A. (2008) GIS based urban seismic risk assessment using RISK.iitb. ISET Jour. Earthquake Tech., v.45, pp.41-63

Vigny, C.A., Socquet, S., Peyrat and several others (2011) The 2010 Mw 8.8 Maule Megathrust Earthquake of Central Chile, Monitored by GPS, Science, v.332(6036), pp.1417-1421.

Internet Reference

http://www.icscanada.ca/

https://www.civil.iitb.ac.in/~rsinha/Vulnerability_Assessment.pdf accessed on 26 July 2020

https://www.esri.com/en-us/what-is-gis/overview

https://training.fema.gov/emiweb/is/icsresource/

https://www.phe.gov/Preparedness/planning/mscc/handbook/chapter1/pages/emergencymanagement.aspx

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >>